Impact of non-native tree species in Europe on soil properties and biodiversity: a review
Authors
Wohlgemuth, Thomas; Gossner, Martin M.; Campagnaro, Thomas; Marchante, Helia; Loo, Marcela van; [et al.]Identifiers
Permanent link (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10017/64643DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.78.87022
ISSN: 1314-2488
Date
2022Academic Departments
Universidad de Alcalá. Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida
Bibliographic citation
NeoBiota, 2022, n. 78, p. 45-69
Keywords
Biodiversity
Biogeography
Forest management
Pairwise stand comparisons
Soil impacts
Description / Notes
COST Action FP1403 (NNEXT) ‘Non-native
tree species for European forests – experiences, risks and opportunities’ supported by
COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)
Document type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Rights
© Pensoft Publishers
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Access rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Abstract
In the context of global change, the integration of non-native tree (NNT) species into European forestry is
increasingly being discussed. The ecological consequences of increasing use or spread of NNTs in European
forests are highly uncertain, as the scientific evidence is either constraint to results from case studies with
limited spatial extent, or concerns global assessments that lack focus on European NNTs. For either case,
generalisations on European NNTs are challenging to draw. Here we compile data on the impacts of seven
important NNTs (Acacia dealbata, Ailanthus altissima, Eucalyptus globulus, Prunus serotina, Pseudotsuga
menziesii, Quercus rubra, Robinia pseudoacacia) on physical and chemical soil properties and diversity
attributes in Europe, and summarise commonalities and differences. From a total of 103 publications
considered, studies on diversity attributes were overall more frequent than studies on soil properties. The
effects on soil properties varied greatly among tree species and depended on the respective soil property.
Overall, increasing (45%) and decreasing (45%) impacts on soil occurred with similar frequency. In
contrast, decreasing impacts on biodiversity were much more frequent (66%) than increasing ones (24%).
Species phylogenetically distant from European tree species, such as Acacia dealbata, Eucalyptus globulus
and Ailanthus altissima, showed the strongest decreasing impacts on biodiversity. Our results suggest that
forest managers should be cautious in using NNTs, as a majority of NNT stands host fewer species when
compared with native tree species or ecosystems, likely reflected in changes in biotic interactions and
ecosystem functions. The high variability of impacts suggests that individual NNTs should be assessed
separately, but NNTs that lack European relatives should be used with particular caution.
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| impact_castro_NB_2022.pdf | 1.433Mb |
|
| Files | Size | Format |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| impact_castro_NB_2022.pdf | 1.433Mb |
|
Collections
- Ciencias de la Vida [536]















