Central sensitization of dorsal root potentials and dorsal root reflexes: An in vitro study in the mouse spinal cord
Identifiers
Permanent link (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10017/57889DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1864
ISSN: 1090-3801
Date
2022-02-01Academic Departments
Universidad de Alcalá. Departamento de Biología de Sistemas
Teaching unit
Unidad Docente Fisiología
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Bibliographic citation
Vicente-Baz, J., Lopez-Garcia, J. A., & Rivera-Arconada, I. (2022). Central sensitization of dorsal root potentials and dorsal root reflexes: An in vitro study in the mouse spinal cord. European journal of pain, 26(2), 356–369.
Description / Notes
14 p.
Project
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO// SAF2016-77585- R
Document type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Rights
© The Authors
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Access rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Abstract
Background: Axo-axonic contacts onto central terminals of primary afferents modulate sensory inputs to the spinal cord. These contacts produce primary afferent depolarization (PAD), which serves as a mechanism for presynaptic inhibition, and also produce dorsal root reflexes (DRRs), which may regulate the excitability of peripheral terminals and second order neurons. We aimed to identify changes in these responses as a consequence of peripheral inflammation. Methods: In vitro spinal cord recordings of spontaneous activities in dorsal and ventral roots were performed in control mice and following paw inflammation. We also used pharmacological assays to define the neurotransmitter systems implicated in such responses. Results: Paw inflammation increased the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous dorsal root depolarizations, the occurrence of DRRs and the amplitude of ventral roots depolarizations. PAD was classified in two different patterns based on their relation to ventral activity: time-locked and independent events. Both patterns increased in amplitude after paw inflammation, and independent events also increased in frequency. The circuits that were responsible for this activity implicated both glutamatergic and GABAergic transmission. Adrenergic modulation differentially affected both types of PAD, and this modulation changed after paw inflammation. Conclusions: Our findings suggest the existence of independent spinal circuits at the origin of PAD and DRRs. Inflammation modulates these circuits differentially, unveiling varied mechanisms of spinal sensitization. This in vitro approach provides an isolated model for the study of the mechanisms of central sensitization and for the performance of pharmacological assays with the purpose of identifying and testing novel antinociceptive targets.
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| central_vicente_EJP_2022.pdf | 1.010Mb |
|
| Files | Size | Format |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| central_vicente_EJP_2022.pdf | 1.010Mb |
|
Collections
- Biología de Sistemas [477]















