More than meets the eye: use of computer vision algorithms to identify stone tool material through the analysis of cut mark micro-morphology.
Identifiers
Permanent link (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10017/55797DOI: 10.1007/s12520-021-01424-y
ISSN: 1866-9557
Date
2021-09-20Academic Departments
Universidad de Alcalá. Departamento de Historia y Filosofía
Teaching unit
Unidad Docente Historia I y Filosofía
Funders
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Bibliographic citation
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2021, v.13, n.167, p.1-11
Keywords
Artificial intelligence
Computer vision
Raw material
Cut marks
Stone tools
Palaeolithic
Project
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Programa Estatal de Fomento de la Investigación Científica y Técnica de Excelencia/ HAR2017-82463-C4-1-P /ES/EVOLUCION CONDUCTUAL DE LOS PRIMEROS SERES HUMANOS: LA FUNCIONALIDAD DE LOS YACIMIENTOS OLDUVAYENSES Y ACHELENSES DE LA GARGANTA DE OLDUVAI (TANZANIA)
Document type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Access rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Abstract
Artifcial intelligence algorithms have recently been applied to taphonomic questions with great success, outperforming previous methods of bone surface modifcation (BSM) identifcation. Following these new developments, here we try diferent deep learning model architectures, optimizers and activation functions to assess if it is possible to identify a stone tool?s raw material simply by looking at the cut marks that it created on bone. The deep learning models correctly discerned between fint, sandstone and quartzite with accuracy rates as high as 78%. Also, single models seem to work better than ensemble ones, and there is no optimal combination of hyperparameters that perform better in every possible scenario. Model fne-tuning is thus advised as a protocol. These results consolidate the potential of deep learning methods to make classifcations out of BSM?s microscopic features with a higher degree of confdence and more objectively than alternative taphonomic procedures.
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| more_cifuentes_AAS_2021.pdf | 1.236Mb |
|
| Files | Size | Format |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| more_cifuentes_AAS_2021.pdf | 1.236Mb |
|
Collections
- Historia y Filosofía [770]















