Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVillarmea Requejo, Stella
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-24T09:07:51Z
dc.date.available2009-11-24T09:07:51Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationREDEN : revista española de estudios norteamericanos, 1999, n. 17-18, p. [219]-235. ISSN 1131-9674en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10017/5017
dc.description.abstractThis essay is intended as a criticism to Donna Haraway's approach, one of the most influential on feminist philosophy and cultural debates in the United States. It first explains her main points: (i) a defense of standpoint epistemology, according to which knowledge is always situated; (ii) a proposal of a postmodemist ontology, according to which there is no subjectivity, no personal identity through time; and (iii) a description of the political strategy that would help to develop emancipatory actions in society, according to which negotiations are not to be grounded on the existence of a bond among women based on the notion of gender. The article attempts to show that these three theses are contradictory.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.publisherUniversidad de Alcalá de Henares. Servicio de Publicacionesen_US
dc.titleConocimientos situados y estrategias feministasen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.subject.ecienciaHistoria de América
dc.subject.ecienciaAmerica-History
dc.subject.ecienciaFilología
dc.subject.ecienciaPhilology
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)