dc.contributor.author | Villarmea Requejo, Stella | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-24T09:07:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-11-24T09:07:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | REDEN : revista española de estudios norteamericanos, 1999, n. 17-18, p. [219]-235. ISSN 1131-9674 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10017/5017 | |
dc.description.abstract | This essay is intended as a criticism to Donna Haraway's approach, one of the
most influential on feminist philosophy and cultural debates in the United States. It first explains her main points: (i) a defense of standpoint epistemology, according to which knowledge is always situated; (ii) a proposal of a postmodemist ontology, according to which there is no subjectivity, no personal identity through time; and (iii) a description of the political strategy that would help to develop emancipatory actions in society, according to which negotiations are not to be grounded on the existence of a bond among women based on the notion of gender. The article attempts to show that these three theses are contradictory. | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.language.iso | spa | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Alcalá de Henares. Servicio de Publicaciones | en_US |
dc.title | Conocimientos situados y estrategias feministas | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | en |
dc.subject.eciencia | Historia de América | |
dc.subject.eciencia | America-History | |
dc.subject.eciencia | Filología | |
dc.subject.eciencia | Philology | |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |