Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaiz Galindo, Jorge 
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Ruiz, Carmen 
dc.contributor.authorGómara , Belen
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T09:16:49Z
dc.date.available2021-06-17T09:16:49Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-12
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAnalytical Methods, 2017, v. 9, n. 19, p. 2897-2908en
dc.identifier.issn1759-9660
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10017/48607en
dc.description.abstractCocaine, cannabis, heroin, and other opioids are among the prevalent drugs in Europe. The use of these drugs is demonstrated by the determination of either parent drugs or related metabolites in a variety of biological samples. Various analytical methodologies can be applied for this purpose, all of which might show relevant differences in analytical performance. In this work we used different GC-MS configurations for the quantitation of cocaine, cocaethylene, benzoylecgonine, morphine, and Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol with the aim of comparing the analytical performance of different GC-MS instruments, different injectors, ion sources, ionization modes, mass analyzers, operating modes, and acquisition modes, in order to find the optimal configuration in terms of sensitivity and precision. Other important factors, such as the derivatization process for GC analysis or the injection mode, were also investigated for the same purpose. A comparative study of different methods used for the calculation of the limits of detection was also performed, in order to compare them in terms of the obtained values and their veracity. Differences found in the results obtained with different configurations showed different limits of detection and different precision. These results allowed us to indicate advantages and limitations, which depended on the configuration of the GC-MS used. Finally, differences up to seven orders of magnitude were found in the LOD values obtained with different methods, some of them being too small to show any measurable peak.en
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto Universitario de Investigación en Ciencias Policiales (IUICP)es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)en
dc.rights© Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectGC-MSen
dc.subjectcocaineen
dc.subjectheroinen
dc.subjectcannabisen
dc.subjectopioids.en
dc.titleComparison of different GC-MS configurations for the determination of prevalent drugs and related metabolitesen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.subject.ecienciaQuímicaes_ES
dc.subject.ecienciaChemistryen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Aclalá. Departamento de Química Analítica, Química Física e Ingeniería Químicaes_Es
dc.date.updated2021-06-17T09:15:47Z
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/C7AY00813Aen
dc.relation.projectIDIUICP-2016-003 (IUICP) "Screening (cribado) de tóxicos mediante cromatografía líquida acoplada a espectrometría de masas con analizador de cuadrupolo y trampa (LC-Q-TRAP-MS) en muestras de sangre total/plasma/suero".es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.identifier.uxxiAR/0000026142en
dc.identifier.publicationtitleAnalytical Methodsen
dc.identifier.publicationvolume9
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage2908
dc.identifier.publicationissue19
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage2897


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons.