Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCereijo Tejedor, Luis 
dc.contributor.authorGullón Tosio, Pedro 
dc.contributor.authorCebrecos Eguren, Alba Amaranta 
dc.contributor.authorBilal Álvarez, Usama 
dc.contributor.authorSantacruz Lozano, José Antonio 
dc.contributor.authorBadland, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorFranco Tejero, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-21T11:17:43Z
dc.date.available2020-07-21T11:17:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of health geographics, 18(1), pp.15–10.en
dc.identifier.issn1476-072X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10017/43890
dc.description.abstractBackground: Identifying socioeconomic determinants that are associated with access to and availability of exercisefacilities is fundamental to supporting physical activity engagement in urban populations, which in turn, may reducehealth inequities. This study analysed the relationship between area-level socioeconomic status (SES) and access to,and availability of, exercise facilities in Madrid, Spain.Methods: Area-level SES was measured using a composite index based on seven sociodemographic indicators.Exercise facilities were geocoded using Google Maps and classified into four types: public, private, low-cost and sessional.Accessibility was operationalized as the street network distance to the nearest exercise facility from each of the125,427 residential building entrances (i.e. portals) in Madrid. Availability was defined as the count of exercise facilitiesin a 1000 m street network buffer around each portal. We used a multilevel linear regression and a zero inflatedPoisson regression analyses to assess the association between area-level SES and exercise facility accessibility andavailability.Results: Lower SES areas had a lower average distance to the closest facility, especially for public and low-cost facilities.Higher SES areas had higher availability of exercise facilities, especially for private and seasonal facilities.Conclusion: Public and low-cost exercise facilities were more proximate in low SES areas, but the overall number offacilities was lower in these areas compared with higher SES areas. Increasing the number of exercise facilities in lowerSES areas may be an intervention to improve health equity.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)en
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en
dc.rights.urihttps://www.biomedcentral.com/about/open-accessen
dc.subjectExerciseen
dc.subjectSocio-economic statusen
dc.subjectExercise facilitiesen
dc.subjectInequitiesen
dc.subjectUrban healthen
dc.titleAccess to and availability of exercise facilities in Madrid: An equity perspectiveen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.subject.ecienciaDeporteses_ES
dc.subject.ecienciaSportsen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Alcalá. Departamento de Cirugía, Ciencias Médicas y Socialeses_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Alcalá. Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas. Unidad docente Educación Física y Deportivaes_ES
dc.date.updated2020-07-21T11:00:41Z
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12942-019-0179-7en
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.identifier.uxxiAR/0000031625
dc.identifier.publicationtitleInternational Journal of Health Geographicsen
dc.identifier.publicationvolume18
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage10
dc.identifier.publicationissue18(1)
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage15


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons.