Evaluation of soil erosion process and conservation practices in the Paragominas-Pa municipality (Brazil)
Authors
Conrado Cruz, DenisIdentifiers
Permanent link (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10017/43728DOI: 10.21163/GT_2019.141.02
ISSN: 1842-5135
Date
2019-06Academic Departments
Universidad de Alcalá. Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida
Teaching unit
Unidad Docente Ecología
Bibliographic citation
Geographia Technica, 2019, v. 14, n. , p. 14-35
Keywords
Agriculture
Environmental variables
Potential for soil loss
Amazon
Document type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
© 2006-2020 - Geographia Technica
Access rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Abstract
Over the last decades, the natural environment has been degraded at a much greater speed than its own resilience. Lack of knowledge about soil natural limitations and mismanagement can increase their degradation and nutrient losses by erosion. The objective of this study was to estimate and map soil vulnerability to erosion through the Universal Equation of Revised Soil Loss (RUSLE) and based on the ecodynamic concept of physical and biotic environment analysis, and finally to evaluate conservation practices in the municipality of Paragominas with the economic database of IBGE / SIDRA. In the two analyzed methods the percentage of area with low and high potential and erosivity estimation were similar. The estimation of low and low-moderate loss and vulnerability represents about 77% (15,064 km2 ) of the territory by RUSLE and 60% (11,485 km2 ), by ecodynamic concept. The high to very high soil loss zones represent only 3% (642 km2 ) and 2.7% (584 km2 ), in the RUSLE and ecodynamic concept, respectively. Most of the variables analyzed in both methods presented low estimation values of loss and erosivity potential. The soil and slope attributes, for example, obtained exactly 79% (15,377 km2 - RUSLE) and 80% (15,572 km2 - ecodynamic concept), except for the climate and factor R attributes, in both methods the vulnerability potential and erosion, were only 1.5% (292 km2 ) and 1.3% (253 km2 ), based on the ecodynamic concept and RUSLE respectively
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| evaluation_conrado_GT_2019.pdf | 1.278Mb |
|
| Files | Size | Format |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| evaluation_conrado_GT_2019.pdf | 1.278Mb |
|
Collections
- Ciencias de la Vida [536]















