Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoreno Mateos, David 
dc.contributor.authorBarbier, Edward B.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Peter C.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Holly P.
dc.contributor.authorMccrackin , Michelle
dc.contributor.authorAronson, James
dc.contributor.authorMeli, Paula
dc.contributor.authorMontoya Terán, Javier Daniel 
dc.contributor.authorRey Benayas, José María 
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-10T13:35:28Z
dc.date.available2019-05-10T13:35:28Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNature Communications, 2017, v. 8, n. , p. 14163-en
dc.identifier.issn2041-1723
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10017/37448
dc.description.abstractEcosystem recovery from anthropogenic disturbances, either without human intervention or assisted by ecological restoration, is increasingly occurring worldwide. As ecosystems progress through recovery, it is important to estimate any resulting deficit in biodiversity and functions. Here we use data from 3,035 sampling plots worldwide, to quantify the interim reduction of biodiversity and functions occurring during the recovery process (that is, the 'recovery debt'). Compared with reference levels, recovering ecosystems run annual deficits of 46&-51% for organism abundance, 27&-33% for species diversity, 32&-42% for carbon cycling and 31&-41% for nitrogen cycling. Our results are consistent across biomes but not across degrading factors. Our results suggest that recovering and restored ecosystems have less abundance, diversity and cycling of carbon and nitrogen than 'undisturbed' ecosystems, and that even if complete recovery is reached, an interim recovery debt will accumulate. Under such circumstances, increasing the quantity of less-functional ecosystems through ecological restoration and offsetting are inadequate alternatives to ecosystem protection.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Centeren
dc.description.sponsorshipGerman Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Researchen
dc.description.sponsorshipSynthesis Centre for Biodiversity Sciencesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en
dc.rights© 2017 The Author(s)en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectConservation biologyen
dc.subjectRestoration ecologyen
dc.titleAnthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debten
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.subject.ecienciaMedio Ambientees_ES
dc.subject.ecienciaEnvironmental scienceen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Alcalá. Departamento de Ciencias de la Vidaes_ES
dc.date.updated2019-05-09T16:07:15Z
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/ncomms14163
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//DBI-1052875/USen
dc.relation.projectIDGerman Research Foundation DFG FZT 118 (sDiv-iDiv, Alemania)en
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.identifier.uxxiAR/0000026765
dc.identifier.publicationtitleNature Communicationsen
dc.identifier.publicationvolume8
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage14163


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons.