Prognostic value of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) and caspases in prostate cancer: caspase-3 forms and XIAP predict biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy
Authors
Rodríguez Berriguete, GonzaloIdentifiers
Permanent link (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10017/32720DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1839-z
PMID: 26507126
ESSN: 1471-2407
Publisher
BioMed Central
Date
2015Bibliographic citation
BMC Cancer. 2015, v. 15, n. 809, p. 1-9
Keywords
Apoptosis
Caspases
Biochemical progression
Inhibitors of apoptosis proteins
Prostate cancer
Project
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI13/1801)
Document type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Publisher's version
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1839-zRights
© Rodríguez-Berriguete et al. Open access, 2015
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Access rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Abstract
Background: The expression status of apoptotic regulators, such as caspases and inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), could reflect the aggressiveness of tumors and, therefore, could be useful as prognostic markers. We explored the associations between tumor expression of caspases and IAPs and clinicopathological features of prostate cancer – clinical and pathological T stage, Gleason score, preoperative serum PSA levels, perineural invasion, lymph node involvement, surgical margin status and overall survival – and evaluated its capability to predict biochemical
progression after radical prostatectomy.
Methods: Protein expression of caspases (procaspase-8, cleaved caspase-8, procaspase-3, cleaved caspase-3,
caspase-7 and procaspase-9) and IAPs (cIAP1/2, cIAP2, NAIP, Survivin and XIAP) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry
in radical prostatectomy samples from 84 prostate cancer patients. Spearman’s test, Kaplan-Meier curves, and univariate
and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed.
Results: cIAP1/2, cIAP2, Survivin, procaspase-8, cleaved caspase-8, procaspase-3 and caspase-7 expression correlated
with at least one clinicopathological feature of the disease. Patients negative for XIAP, procaspase-3 or cleaved
caspase-3 had a significantly worse prognosis. Of note, XIAP, procaspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 were predictors
of biochemical progression independent of Gleason score and pathological T stage.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that alterations in the expression of IAPs and caspases contribute to the
malignant behavior of prostate tumors and suggest that tumor expression of XIAP, procaspase-3 and cleaved
caspase-3 may help to identify prostate cancer patients at risk of progression.
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format |
|
---|---|---|---|
prognostic_paniagua_BMC_2015.pdf | 1.544Mb |
![]() |
Files | Size | Format |
|
---|---|---|---|
prognostic_paniagua_BMC_2015.pdf | 1.544Mb |
![]() |